SIMPLE !

I don’t agree with the needle ex-change plan. Although there are many ways that can make it safe to people, it still means like that we support people to use drugs indirectly. The safe way from the using of syringes even has many bad impacts than the good impacts.                 The using of syringes just supports and helps the rich drug users. So how is with the poor one? In the end, they use needle ex-change plan because it is more cheap than the syringes. Besides, in some countries, it is not easily can be used by people because they need some requirement before it is used like the doctor’s prescription. Other things is about the availability of the syringes. It is impossible if all the countries provide it. It because some are developing countries, not developed countries.                 The needle exchange plan who make it eas...

Introduction Arms and the Man by George Bernard Shaw To the irreverent--and which of us will claim entire exemption from that comfortable classification?--there is something very amusing in the attitude of the orthodox criticism toward Bernard Shaw. He so obviously disregards all the canons and unities and other things which every well-bred dramatist is bound to respect that his work is really unworthy of serious criticism (orthodox). Indeed he knows no more about the dramatic art than, according to his own story in "The Man of Destiny," Napoleon at Tavazzano knew of the Art of War. But both men were successes each in his way--the latter won victories and the former gained audiences, in the very teeth of the accepted theories of war and the theatre. Shaw does not know that it is unpardonable sin to have his characters make long speeches at one another, apparently thinking that this embargo ap...